Browse releases

By date

September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006

Media Resources

Print

Release Date: 12/27/2012

Consumer Reports Teams With Wisconsin Collaborative For Healthcare Quality (WCHQ) To Rate Medical Groups

Ratings provide snapshot of care based on three major categories: cancer screening tests, care for people 60 and older, and treating people with existing heart disease 

MHQP%20Consumer%20Reports%20Insert%202012-1 copyYONKERS, NY — In a special edition of its magazine, Consumer Reports is publishing Ratings of 19 Wisconsin medical groups which, combined, serve nearly half the state’s patients.  The Ratings are the result of a unique collaboration with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) and the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ) with whom the medical groups have voluntarily shared their performance data.

The Ratings include one overall score and seven measures based on data that the groups themselves collect on how well they provide essential care, such as screening for certain cancers and vaccinating against pneumonia, as well as how well they treat people who have heart disease.  Overall, Wisconsin groups stack up well.  All 19 groups ranked at or above the national average in CR’s overall score.  

“The good news in Wisconsin is that numerous physician groups have voluntarily shared their   performance results and many are outperforming the national average.  Those groups should be commended,” said John Santa, M.D., M.P.H., director of the Consumer Reports Health Ratings Center.   “We have long urged all physicians to report their data to the public. Only then will patients be able to make fully informed choices when choosing healthcare providers.” 

Consumer Reports is producing a special version of its magazine for distribution to subscribers and newsstands in Wisconsin. It will have a different cover, highlighting the story “How Does Your Doctor Compare?” and feature a special, 20-page insert with the Ratings of medical groups. The Ratings of these groups (for the measures discussed below and several others) will also be available online at   www.wchq.org.   

“We can take great pride in the high quality of care these clinics are providing; at the same time, the leaders of these groups would be the first to say that there is always room to improve,” said Chris Queram, president and chief executive officer of WCHQ. “Their success demonstrates the value of measuring their quality and reporting it publicly. We know from independent research that clinics engaged in public reporting perform better than those that do not.”

The Ratings are being published on the heels of CR’s recent Ratings of doctors’ practices in Massachusetts and Minnesota, released in May and August, respectively.  The three efforts are the result of a grant from RWJF related to a unique program called Aligning Forces for Quality. That initiative is RWJF’s signature effort to lift the overall quality of health care in 16 targeted communities (including Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Wisconsin), reduce racial and ethnic disparities, and provide models for national reform.

“This partnership is an important advance in our ongoing effort to prepare and disseminate easy-to-understand information on the quality of care,” said Anne F. Weiss, M.P.P., Quality/Equality team director and senior program officer, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. “Patients can use this information to make informed choices about their own care and become better partners with their doctors. Doctors and their care teams can use the reports to compare their performance to others and identify areas for improvement.” 

The measures in CR’s Ratings don’t look at everything doctors should do to care for their patients, but they do represent some of the best practices in primary care, and they give a snapshot of the care a medical group provides.   Some highlights from the report:

  • Overall Results.  The Ratings are published in conjunction with the WCHQ, a voluntary consortium of Wisconsin health systems, medical groups, hospitals, and health plans, which has publicly reported on healthcare quality in Wisconsin since 2003.  Most groups are doing well. Two groups—Marshfield Clinic and ThedaCare Physicians—earned the highest Rating on all but one individual measure.   While no group scored below the national average for breast cancer or colon cancer screening, cholesterol control, and pneumonia vaccination, there were three groups that earned below average marks in two or more categories, and no group earned CR’s highest score across all seven measures.

  • Cancer screening.   Among the most effective cancer screening tests are those for breast and cervical cancer in women, and colorectal cancer in all adults.  All 19 medical groups had rates for breast and colon cancer screening that were above the national average, and all but two did the same for cervical cancer.  Four medical groups earned CR’s highest Rating in each of those measures:  Aurora Medical Group, Gundersen Clinic, Prevea Health, and ThedaCare Physicians.  By “hitting excuses head on,” ThedaCare increased screening rates for colonoscopy and mammography with its “Wally Polyp” campaign featuring a cartoon polyp. 

  • Prevention for people 60 and over.  Health issues of particular concern later in life include osteoporosis and pneumonia.  All 19 Wisconsin medical groups beat the average national vaccination rate for pneumonia for adults over 60. Gundersen Clinic led Wisconsin with 91 percent of its older patients getting the shot.  All but five of the medical groups beat the national average for percent of eligible patients screened for osteoporosis, with Marshfield Clinic leading the way with 87 percent. 

  • Managing heart disease.  Wisconsin medical groups are doing a good job when it comes to treating people with a history of heart attack or other forms of coronary artery disease.   All 19 were above the national average for the percentage of patients getting their LDL (bad) cholesterol level under control.  Four groups—Bellin Medical Group, Dean Clinic, Marshfield Clinic, and ThedaCare Physicians—earned CR’s highest score in LDL screening and control.  While there is no national data against which to compare blood pressure control and aspirin therapy, two national initiatives suggest that Wisconsin medical groups are doing well in those areas.

See press release archive

RSS News Feed

Get all the latest information from the CR Press Room delivered right to your desktop.